We're all looking at a different picture through this new frame of mind

and for ps i love you.

just finished it so ill zip through a few things while they are on my mind.

Why is it that it american romance/dramedies the protagonists, when typically poor, or at least struggling, are not at all that. cliche answer-we lika the stuff.

A bipolar movie, or i over-analysed, or im bipolar. two of the three at least.

An irishman played by a glaswegian, an american played by a englishman, and an irishman playing an american.

agree with the eliot worrying. it happened more than once. hypocritical it was at times in general. all we have is an end, all we have is love, all we have is the past/passed, shoes. dont like it one bit. its a complete logical fallacy i think, as opposed to a partial logical fallacy? sounded good at the time....

her friends were utterly and fully annoying.

novel written by bertie's daughter. weird trivia bit of no consequence.

first sequence had my hopes very high. godardian/allenian/williamsian/ perfect, but as all american dramedies go, the plot inevitably follows a paved road thereafter.

i dont think i like harry connick jr. ever.

and now to return to irmo for the first funeral of a friend.



and im still laughing at john terry, the slag. look at the video where tevez got his yellow, terry clearly snots on tevez's neck. england captain everyone. (former)