http://www.boomkat.com/item.cfm?id=259002
If having a blog was outlawed, then all outlaws would be bloggers. a fallacy?
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
all these things in all positions
Monday, February 15, 2010
how to be offensive in 140 characters (or less) ((as it was received by the editors of the op-ed page at the ny times))
I'm a self-confessed Twitter addict. Its successes are well reported, for instance it played a major part in opening a window into Iran last year. It may have very nearly caused the fall of one of the most vile regimes on the planet. But, lets be realistic, so many tweets (such a cringe-worthy word) serve nothing of that sort of purpose. Tweets are just the ways our new culture explains the phenomena of daily life. The things we see, that which interests us, our plans. In this regard, Twitter might be the pulse of culture.
My family's heritage in central Europe is mostly a mystery to those of us still alive. In large part, the paternal side of my family doesn't want to know what occurred before we got off the boat in New York City and made our way to the steel city of Cleveland. We simply do not talk about it. Until i went to the Czech Republic last summer, no one in my family had been back to Bohemia, much less to Tábor and Písek, what we know to be our ancestral homes since the turn of the last century. My great aunt did her fair share of genealogical research, but that was in the 1950s and she was only able to go as far back as about the 1880s. She was able to follow some leads that seemed to indicate that some family members (the 2nd cousin twice removed type, or however that goes, the not directly blood-related kind, but close enough for them to have common ancestry) were in the camps in World War II.
Imagine my dismay/shock/horror when I read on Twitter today:
''I would love for this stupid sickness to go away so I can enjoy Dachau tomorrow and Neuschwanstein on Wednesday!!!''
Neuschwanstein is a perfectly lovely place, I hear. It is great great for tourists, a fine day out by all accounts. I hear it was built after such a thing could have been useful as a defensive fortress by some mad Bavarian royal. I don't know much about it really.
Sunday, February 14, 2010
via chicago
i love wilco, and i love chicago. there isnt any difference between the two.
supercities that ive been to that i could envision myself living in-chicago and london. and london and i have perhaps too much of a love/hate thing going on with ldn for me to last there. nyc, im sorry, it would just make too much sense. chicago has the real people. and it has wilco.
jeff tweedy though. my dad and someone else told me that tweedy and i act the same, when we were watching the 'i am trying to break your heart' documentary. i still dont know how to take that label. he tends to be impossible to work with and loads up on prescription meds. eh 2007-2008 was then, now is now.
talked with burns last thurs. he noticed my wilco shirt that i had worn a week or two before, went to asking me if i was going to see them in atlanta this month, said no, i have a bit of a cash flow crisis at the moment and ive gotten to see them a few times already ((chicago 2008, outdoors, grant park, lying/laying? in the grass as the sun set behind the city),etc etc the poetics arent really important). he said his kid is peeved at him for not jumping on tickets before they sold out, so hes looking on stubhub. told him theyll be around again. ill see to it. hopefully around october.
The cash machine is blue and green
For a hundred in twenties and a small service fee
I could spend three dollars and sixty-three cents
On Diet Coca-Cola and unlit cigarettes
I wonder why we listen to poets
When nobody gives a fuck
How hot and sorrowful
This machine begs for luck
All my lies are always wishes
I know I would die if I could come back new
Friday, February 12, 2010
blogexchangenachtconmigueldewitt
right so i told wordtruncheon.blogspot.com to write on the radio dept. song 'why wont you talk about it?' should be interesting read it there,etc. he has told me to write on otis taylor, any song. not what i was hoping for, i gotta say. this is going to be painful.
pretty revealing stuff for us. youve got the modern on one hand, the embodiment of the angel- the twangy guitar line-the guitar born out the civil rights act and the supposed creation of equality, but struck with the reality that these aims remain totally unfulfilled, economic inequality increases, as services increase for the haves, the have nots still are unable to attain the most basic standard of living. the kimbrough line's history is intrinsically tied to that of the banjo. the banjo line-the past, the history-with its late entrance, from the left-the past, signifies the angel peering backwards yet propelled forwards in time, never able to address/redress/remediate the problems of the past.
in benjamin's own words because he said it best:
His eyes are staring, his mouth is open, his wings are spread. This is how one pictures the angel of history. His face is turned toward the past. Where we perceive a chain of events, he sees one single catastrophe which keeps piling wreckage upon wreckage and hurls it in front of his feet. The angel would like to stay, awaken the dead, and make whole what has been smashed. But a storm is blowing from Paradise; it has got caught in his wings with such violence that the angel can no longer close them. The storm irresistibly propels him into the future to which his back is turned, while the pile of debris before him grows skyward. This storm is what we call progress.
its a shitty world people, and i'll shamelessly plug for healthcare reform.
now it would be great to end the song after one guitar-> banjo cycle, but that doesnt adhere to the paradigms of music, and since we adhere to the paradigms of music, unless we are say, saul williams, we can/have to take it as it is. the theme remains the same. and i am going to bed.